ACT employment law: choose the right claim and protect the next deadline

A dismissal, workplace complaint and public-service review can need different action. Compare the routes below, separate the deadlines, and use the eight-item checklist to prepare for advice.

Key points

  • Record when a dismissal actually took effect, as well as when notice arrived. Threatened dismissal, stand-down and an investigation are not automatically a completed dismissal.
  • Unfair dismissal and general protections ask different legal questions. Compare the claim routes before filing; overlapping proceedings can be restricted.
  • ACT Public Service and Commonwealth public service employment are different. Identify the actual employer and agreement before using an ACTPS internal-review deadline.
  • For ACT discrimination, conduct more than two years earlier can be a ground to close a complaint; it is not an absolute two-year filing bar. A referral statement starts a separate ACAT referral clock.
  • The unfair-dismissal compensation cap is a ceiling, not a likely payout. The current $95,050 half-threshold can be reduced by the alternative 26-week remuneration cap.
  • Use the eight-item evidence checklist and short chronology guide. A hotline call or consultation booking does not file a claim or stop time.

If you have been dismissed from an ACT job, an ordinary unfair-dismissal or general-protections-dismissal application to the Fair Work Commission is due within 21 days after the dismissal took effect. Eligibility and extension tests differ. An internal grievance, a legal-advice request or negotiations do not themselves lodge that application. Other employment issues use different routes: ACTPS reviews depend on the applicable agreement, and ACT discrimination complaints normally begin with the Human Rights Commission. Start with the decision, employer and effective date.

Checked on 24 October 2026: current Fair Work and ACT legislation, the applicable ACTPS administrative agreement and current bargaining portal, official regulator guidance, and the served service terms. Sources and limits of this check.

Match the problem to the legal question

ACT employment generally falls within the national Fair Work system, including ACTPS employment, but the Fair Work Act has specific coverage and eligibility rules. Territory public-service law, an award or enterprise agreement and ACT discrimination law can also matter. A Canberra workplace address alone does not identify the right claim.

Start with the employer’s legal name, your status and the action you want challenged. Employee and contractor labels, an ABN or an invoice do not alone settle status. The Act’s applicable relationship test examines substance, practical reality and performance, with application and opt-out qualifications. Obtain advice if status or cross-border employment is disputed.

Scroll the tables sideways to compare all columns.

Which route needs checking?
Your situationPossible routeKey distinction
Employment has ended and the dismissal seems harsh, unjust or unreasonableFWC unfair dismissalMinimum service and award/agreement/earnings eligibility apply; ordinary filing is within 21 days after dismissal took effect.
Dismissal or other adverse action for a prohibited reasonFair Work general protectionsIdentify the workplace right, protected ground or activity and the reason alleged; ordinary unfairness alone is insufficient.
ACTPS management, disciplinary or recruitment decisionApplicable agreement and statutory review mechanismReviewable decisions, exclusions, recipients and clocks differ; ACAT is not a general ACTPS dismissal-appeal tribunal.
Discrimination, sexual harassment or victimisation under ACT lawACT Human Rights Commission, with a possible later ACAT referralCoverage, exceptions, complaint closure and referral requirements need separate checking.
Unpaid wages, leave or a disputed contract termFWO information, agreement dispute process or appropriate legal proceedingsPrepare an entitlement calculation; a complaint is not the same as a court claim, and different time limits apply.
Ongoing bullying, unsafe work or workplace injuryFWC preventive orders, relevant safety regulator or compensation schemeStopping future bullying, enforcing safety duties and obtaining injury compensation are different tasks.

One event can raise several issues, but Fair Work Act sections 725–734 restrict overlapping proceedings in specified circumstances. Get advice about the choice before lodging multiple dismissal or discrimination claims.

Two dismissal claims with different eligibility and remedies

Unfair dismissal asks whether a qualifying dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable, was not a genuine redundancy and, for a small business, was not consistent with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code. A forced resignation can sometimes count as dismissal; an ordinary resignation, demotion or fixed-term expiry needs its own assessment.

The usual minimum service is six months, or one year for a small-business employer. “Fewer than 15 employees” is not simply the number at your worksite: associated entities and qualifying casual employees affect the count. Casual service has regular-and-systematic and reasonable-expectation conditions. A probation label does not replace these statutory tests.

The employee must also be covered by a modern award, have an enterprise agreement applying, or satisfy the alternative earnings gateway. The high-income threshold is $190,100 for dismissals on or after 1 July 2026. The earnings limb requires the relevant sum to be less than the threshold; award or agreement coverage can qualify a higher earner. Salary alone is not always the statutory earnings figure.

General protections instead requires a protected basis and prohibited reason for adverse action: for example, action because of exercising a workplace right, a protected attribute or protected industrial activity. The unfair-dismissal minimum-service and income gateway does not itself apply. That does not mean every probationary dismissal or workplace disagreement is a general-protections breach.

The FWC ordinarily tries to resolve a general-protections dismissal dispute. It does not automatically decide a contested breach at arbitration. If unresolved, a certificate can lead to a separate court application or consensual FWC arbitration, with further short deadlines. The rebuttable presumption about the reason for action does not remove every evidentiary requirement.

For unfair dismissal, procedural fairness matters alongside the reason: notification, an opportunity to respond, relevant warnings and any unreasonable refusal of a support person at dismissal discussions. There is no universal rule requiring three warnings or a support person at every workplace meeting. A genuine redundancy also involves applicable consultation and reasonable redeployment questions.

Preserve the termination letter and effective date. Do not wait for negotiations, internal reconsideration or a booked appointment to finish before checking the filing deadline.

Use the event that starts each clock

Sections 366 and 394 of the Fair Work Act, the Human Rights Commission Act and the applicable ACTPS agreement use different triggers. The table gives ordinary periods and key qualifications, not a personalised last-day calculation. If time is short or has passed, obtain urgent advice about the actual route.

Scroll the tables sideways to compare all columns.

Common ACT employment clocks
StepOrdinary period and triggerQualification
Unfair-dismissal application to FWCWithin 21 days after the dismissal took effectEligibility applies. Extension requires exceptional circumstances assessed under section 394.
General-protections dismissal application to FWCWithin 21 days after the dismissal took effectA different claim and extension test under section 366; ongoing non-dismissal disputes do not inherit this dismissal clock.
Next step after a general-protections dismissal certificateOrdinarily within 14 days after the FWC certificate is issuedCourt proceedings and consensual FWC arbitration have separate provisions and extension powers; interim-injunction proceedings have a qualification.
Request ACT discrimination referral to ACATOrdinarily within 60 days after you are given the referral statementLate referral and specified complaint-closure grounds need additional requirements; not every closed complaint can be referred.
Internal review under the ACTPS administrative agreementOrdinarily within 28 calendar days after advice of the decisionClause I3.3.2; extenuating circumstances may support another agreed period. Failure or refusal to decide has a separate trigger.
Specified disciplinary/underperformance appeal under that agreementReceived by the Convenor within 14 calendar days of notification or awarenessClause J2.1.3; only appellable decisions under J1.3. Termination is excluded and recruitment appeals have different rules.

These ACTPS periods are examples from the Administrative and Related Classifications Agreement, not universal deadlines for every public employee. Keep notices, envelopes, emails, referral statements and certificates showing when the relevant event occurred.

Check your agreement before using an internal appeal process

The current ACTPS agreements portal states that the Administrative and Related Classifications Agreement 2023–2026 continues while bargaining proceeds; the proposed 2026–2029 agreement was not approved in the September 2026 ballot. A nominal expiry date alone does not mean the earlier agreement stopped applying. Check the current instrument covering your classification.

For employees covered by that administrative agreement, section I provides internal review of specified actions, with substantial exclusions. Clause I3.3.2 normally requires the application within 28 calendar days after advice of the decision, unless another period is agreed because of extenuating circumstances. Clause I3.4 addresses an apparent failure or refusal to decide. A preliminary discussion under I3.1 is not itself the complete application requirement.

Section J provides a separate appeal mechanism for listed misconduct, disciplinary, underperformance and other decisions. The written application must identify the decision, reasons and outcome sought, and be received by the Convenor within the J2 deadline. It is a defined procedural review, not a general right to rehear any disagreement. Termination decisions are excluded from the listed disciplinary and underperformance appeals.

Section K deals separately with particular recruitment, promotion and temporary-transfer decisions. Eligibility, classification limits, joint-selection exclusions, Gazette notification and notification/awareness triggers can matter. Do not substitute the section I or J clock for a recruitment appeal.

Part 9 of the Public Sector Management Act 1994 and the Public Sector Management Standards 2016 sit alongside the relevant industrial instrument. The Standards preserve specified older provisions subject to qualifications; citing the 2006 Standards alone is incomplete. These laws do not make ACAT a general forum for reviewing any ACTPS disciplinary or termination decision.

A Commonwealth APS employee working in Canberra has a different employer and review framework. Do not import ACTPS agreement clauses or a Merit Protection Commissioner process from one system into the other. For any dismissal, check Fair Work eligibility and its deadline independently of internal correspondence.

Obtain the actual decision, reasons, applicable agreement and review instructions. Union or lawyer assistance may help identify the permitted route, but an enquiry does not establish an extension or stay.

Separate the complaint stage from an ACAT referral

The Discrimination Act 1991 covers specified discrimination, sexual harassment and victimisation in employment. Direct and indirect discrimination, the protected attribute, reasonable adjustments, inherent requirements and statutory exceptions need assessment. An unpleasant or unfair decision is not automatically unlawful discrimination.

ACT complaints normally begin with the ACT Human Rights Commission. Under the Human Rights Commission Act, a complaint is ordinarily written; assistance and an exceptional oral-complaint pathway are available. Explain what happened, who did it, the dates, the alleged legal basis and the outcome sought.

Section 78 permits the Commission to close a complaint where the complained-of act occurred more than two years earlier. This is a discretionary closure ground, not an absolute two-year filing bar or a reason to delay a recent complaint. Other closure grounds also apply.

Where the statutory referral process is available, the ordinary 60-day period runs from when the complainant is given a discrimination referral statement. It does not simply run from every complaint closure. Section 82 contains exceptions to giving a statement; late requests require exceptional circumstances that prevented timely action, and specified closure grounds require ACAT leave.

The ACAT discrimination guide explains the referral procedure and that a late request may require submissions and a hearing. Its brief reference to closure should be read with the Act’s precise referral-statement trigger. If a claim is established, section 53E provides possible orders; compensation is not automatic.

Federal discrimination and workplace sexual-harassment processes can provide other routes with their own eligibility, transitions and deadlines. This page does not calculate those separate time limits. Obtain advice about overlap and election restrictions before starting more than one proceeding.

Keep the complaint, closure letter, referral statement and proof of when it was given to you. Do not assume mediation, an internal investigation or a pending advice appointment pauses another limitation period.

Turn the workplace complaint into a documented entitlement question

For wages and minimum conditions, identify the award or agreement, classification, hours, relevant dates and payments actually received. The Fair Work Ombudsman can provide information about minimum entitlements. A contractual term cannot simply displace applicable statutory minimums. A demand to the employer or FWO enquiry is not the same as commencing court proceedings.

Make a period-by-period table of hours, the claimed rate, what was paid and the difference. Keep the basis for overtime, penalties, allowances, deductions and leave calculations. Section 544 generally limits civil-remedy proceedings to six years, while section 545 also limits retrospective payment orders. Those provisions do not create a universal six-year deadline for every employment dispute.

The Fair Work small-claims procedure can apply to specified claims up to $100,000, excluding interest, subject to its requirements. That is a procedural limit, not the maximum value of every wage claim or a grant of general employment jurisdiction to ACAT. Court, filing and service requirements need separate checking.

Under the ACT Long Service Leave Act, covered employees ordinarily qualify after seven years; the statutory accrual is one-fifth of a month for each year, commonly expressed as 6.0667 weeks after seven years. The Act excludes public employees, and portable schemes or preserved industrial entitlements may change the route. Consult WorkSafe ACT guidance for the applicable scheme.

Payment for service between five and seven years is conditional on the statutory cessation grounds; it is not payable on every voluntary resignation. ACTPS leave and portable-industry calculations need their own instrument. Do not assume the private-sector seven-year rule applies identically to an ACTPS employee.

For a disputed contractor arrangement, sham-contracting allegation, restraint, confidentiality clause or proposed deed of release, keep the actual contract and evidence of how the work operated. Ask for advice on the specific clause, statutory protection and proposed outcome. Signing a deed can affect later claims, but neither universal enforceability nor automatic invalidity should be assumed.

Use records you may lawfully hold. Do not obtain evidence by entering someone else’s account or copying unrelated employer, client or personal files.

Check the protection and the scheme separately

The FWC stop-bullying jurisdiction requires the relevant covered-worker and business conditions, repeated unreasonable behaviour and a risk to health and safety. Reasonable management action carried out reasonably is excluded. Preventive orders require a continuing risk and cannot order a monetary payment; this is not a general compensation claim for past bullying.

The WorkSafe ACT bullying service standard explains the regulator’s safety role. It does not provide private legal advice, industrial mediation or a FWC stop-bullying order. A workplace injury may also raise a compensation question, but these routes serve different purposes.

Fair Work Act section 352 protects against dismissal because of a prescribed temporary absence due to illness or injury. It is not a blanket ban on any dismissal while a person is on sick leave. Regulation 3.01 has notice/evidence requirements and qualifications involving an absence exceeding three months, or aggregate absences exceeding three months within 12 months, together with paid-personal-leave conditions.

Workers’ compensation absence is not treated as paid personal/carer’s leave for that particular rule. Exceeding the three-month threshold does not itself make dismissal lawful: other protections, discrimination law, the reason for dismissal and the applicable instrument can still matter.

ACTPS employees are covered by the Commonwealth SRC scheme through ACT self-insurance, with EML Solutions identified as claims manager; that is different from the ordinary ACT private-sector workers’ compensation route. Commonwealth employees and other employers can have different coverage and administrators. Check the employer and insurer rather than assuming every Canberra injury belongs with the same body.

Preserve medical certificates, absence notifications, injury reports, claim numbers and decisions. Obtain advice promptly on the actual injury or review deadline; this guide does not calculate compensation benefits or the time limit for every scheme. A safety complaint does not automatically lodge an injury claim or a dismissal application.

A performance plan, illness, injury and bullying allegation may overlap. Keep the dates and the stated reason for each action separate so the appropriate protection can be assessed.

Compare filing costs with remedies and private legal fees

The FWC’s 1 July 2026 announcement lists a $92.70 application fee for unfair dismissal, general-protections dismissal and non-dismissal disputes, and stop-bullying applications, among other specified matters. The Fair Work Regulations provide for waiver where the Commission is satisfied payment would cause serious hardship. Check the fee when filing.

Unfair-dismissal reinstatement and compensation are distinct outcomes. Compensation requires reinstatement to be inappropriate and compensation to be appropriate. The Commission considers the statutory factors, including mitigation, and can reduce an amount for misconduct. Unfair-dismissal compensation does not include shock, distress, hurt or humiliation.

Scroll the tables sideways to compare all columns.

Costs and remedies are different questions
ItemCurrent guideWhat it does not mean
Listed FWC application fee$92.70 from 1 July 2026; serious-hardship waiver can be availableThis is not the fee for every court, appeal or private lawyer.
Unfair-dismissal compensation capLesser of specified 26-week remuneration and half the relevant high-income threshold; current half-threshold $95,050Not a usual settlement or guaranteed award. Leave/remuneration rules and the dismissal date matter.
General-protections remediesDepend on the proven breach and appropriate court or consensual arbitration processThe unfair-dismissal cap is not a universal cap on these claims; a large payment is not assured.
Private advice and ongoing representationAsk what is included, what further work costs and whether permission to appear is requiredA consultation is not automatically drafting, negotiations, filing or hearing representation.

Parties ordinarily bear their own FWC costs, but statutory exceptions permit costs orders; court costs rules differ. Do not assume the loser always pays, that every fee is recoverable, or that settlement will occur within a stated number of weeks.

Five points to put in the first advice request

First identify the employer, your role, employment start date and whether you remain employed. State the effective dismissal date separately from the letter date, last shift and notice period. If the date is disputed, explain why rather than choosing the most convenient date.

Second list the important events in date order: a complaint or request, allegations, meetings, warnings, illness or leave, the decision and any internal response. Keep each entry factual and identify the supporting record.

Third explain the legal question you need assessed: unfairness, an alleged prohibited reason, a particular ACTPS review right, discrimination, unpaid entitlements or another issue. Do not assume that calling conduct “bullying” or “discrimination” establishes the elements.

Fourth list every process already started, including forms filed, claim numbers, certificates, referral statements and settlement offers. Tell the adviser about approaching dates and any deed already signed. This helps identify overlapping-proceeding restrictions and the next required step.

Fifth say what outcome you seek and ask which forum, deadline and evidence matter. Confirm who will prepare and lodge any application, by when, and how you will receive filing confirmation. A consultation booking or unanswered email is not proof of filing.

This is a preparation framework, not a completed claim form or a promise of eligibility. Use truthful facts and preserve delivery and filing receipts.

Eight document groups to prepare before advice

  1. The complete termination, stand-down or other decision notice, with effective dates, receipt dates, reasons, envelopes and original emails.
  2. Your contract or engagement letter, employer’s legal name and ABN, role description and records relevant to employee or contractor status.
  3. The applicable award or enterprise agreement, classification, start date, casual work pattern and available employer-size information.
  4. Payslips, rosters, timesheets, payment records, leave balances and a period-by-period calculation of any claimed shortfall.
  5. Allegations, warnings, performance plans, meeting invitations, relevant policies, responses and support-person requests.
  6. A dated incident chronology, messages and documents you may lawfully retain, witness details and any earlier workplace complaints.
  7. Relevant medical certificates, absence notifications, injury reports, compensation decisions and insurer or rehabilitation contacts.
  8. Any lodged forms, claim numbers, certificates, referral statements, orders, deadline letters and proposed or signed settlement deeds.

Keep complete employment, health and case records for the lawyer’s agreed document channel. Initially give AI intake only what is necessary to arrange assistance; do not upload unrelated employer or client information. Read the privacy policy before sharing sensitive details.

Ask a lawyer to assess the claim, evidence and next deadline

The checklist helps a lawyer compare dismissal, prohibited-reason, public-service, discrimination and entitlement routes. Explain the earliest possible deadline and any process already started. Confirm whether the lawyer can assist, what the consultation covers, and who is responsible for any filing. Drafting, negotiation, court attendance and ongoing work are separate unless expressly agreed.

Legal Hotline charges AUD$295 including GST for matching, booking, intake and arranging an initial consultation with an independent participating lawyer. Eligible booked customers pay no further lawyer charge for that initial consultation. Suitability, availability, conflicts and acceptance apply; confirm the scope and terms before payment. Later legal work requires a separate agreement and fees.

Legal Hotline is not a law firm. A booking does not file a claim, request a statutory review or extend a deadline. The free 1800 951 176 line provides AI-generated general information, not a lawyer’s advice or the Fair Work Commission. Intake may be transcribed and shared as explained in the privacy policy linked below.

Official help and free legal information

Ask each service about its role, eligibility and availability. Registry or regulator information is different from legal advice, and seeking help does not lodge or extend a claim.

Fair Work Commission Workplace Advice Service

Eligible unrepresented employees who are not union members, and qualifying small businesses, may obtain free independent advice on listed employment issues, subject to appointment availability. A request is not an application to the Commission and does not pause a deadline.

Legal Aid ACT Helpline

1300 654 314. Paralegals provide information and help arrange appointments; the helpline expressly does not provide legal advice over the phone. Advice and representation depend on scope, eligibility and availability.

Fair Work Ombudsman

13 13 94 for information about wages, minimum entitlements and workplace obligations. FWO is separate from the Fair Work Commission; an enquiry is not a dismissal filing.

ACT Human Rights Commission

02 6205 2222 for complaint information and assistance with ACT discrimination processes. This is not an automatic grant of representation or an ACAT referral.

WorkSafe ACT

Use the current contact directory for workplace safety and ACT long-service-leave questions. Check separately which regulator, insurer or administrator handles a workplace injury.

Your union or applicable ACTPS agreement

Union assistance depends on membership and service rules. For ACTPS decisions, obtain the actual agreement and review instructions; Commonwealth APS staff should use their own framework.

ACT employment law questions

How long do I have to lodge an unfair-dismissal claim in the ACT?

An ordinary application to the Fair Work Commission must be made within 21 days after the dismissal took effect, subject to eligibility. Late applications require exceptional circumstances under section 394. Record the effective date separately from the letter date. An internal grievance, negotiation or lawyer appointment does not itself lodge the application or extend time.

Is general protections the same as unfair dismissal?

No. Unfair dismissal concerns a qualifying dismissal that is harsh, unjust or unreasonable and has service and award/agreement/earnings requirements. General protections concerns adverse action for a prohibited reason linked to a protected basis. Its dismissal application ordinarily also has a 21-day clock, but the eligibility and extension tests differ. Seek advice before choosing overlapping claims.

Can I bring a claim while on probation or earning over $190,100?

A probation label alone does not decide statutory rights. Unfair dismissal usually needs six months’ service, or one year for a small-business employer, and the applicable eligibility gateway. Award or enterprise-agreement coverage can qualify a higher earner. The alternative earnings limb must be below the current threshold. General protections and discrimination claims have different requirements.

Does an ACTPS internal review stop the Fair Work deadline?

Do not assume it does. For covered employees, the administrative agreement has a 28-calendar-day internal-review rule and a separate 14-calendar-day receipt rule for specified appeals, with different triggers and exclusions. Termination is excluded from those listed disciplinary appeals. Check the applicable agreement and Fair Work filing deadline independently.

Can ACAT review any ACT public-service dismissal?

No general right of that kind is established. The actual law, agreement and decision determine any review right. ACTPS disciplinary and termination routes are not the same as ACAT discrimination proceedings, and Commonwealth APS processes are different again. Obtain the decision and governing instrument before choosing a forum.

Do ACT discrimination complaints have a strict two-year deadline?

Conduct more than two years earlier is a statutory ground on which the Human Rights Commission may close a complaint, not an absolute filing bar. A later ACAT referral ordinarily requires a request within 60 days after the complainant is given a referral statement. Exceptions, late-referral requirements and particular closure grounds matter; do not wait to seek advice.

What should I do after receiving a general-protections certificate?

Check its issue date immediately. A court application or consensual FWC arbitration ordinarily has a separate 14-day period after the certificate is issued, with distinct extension provisions and an interim-injunction qualification for court proceedings. A conference does not automatically become an arbitration. Obtain advice on the correct next step and filing responsibility.

Is the maximum unfair-dismissal payout $95,050?

That is the current half-threshold for dismissals on or after 1 July 2026, but the statutory cap is the lesser of that amount and the specified 26-week remuneration amount, with leave qualifications. Compensation is discretionary and may be much lower. It excludes shock, distress, hurt and humiliation. General-protections remedies are not subject to that unfair-dismissal cap.

Can I be dismissed while on sick leave?

Section 352 protects against dismissal because of a prescribed temporary illness or injury absence; it does not prohibit every dismissal during leave. Evidence, absence length, aggregate absences and paid-leave conditions matter under regulation 3.01. Exceeding three months does not automatically make dismissal lawful because other protections can still apply. Obtain advice on the actual reason and circumstances.

Do all ACT workers receive long service leave after seven years?

No. The ACT Long Service Leave Act ordinarily gives covered employees an entitlement after seven years, but excludes public employees and interacts with portable schemes and preserved industrial terms. Payment between five and seven years requires specified cessation grounds. Check your scheme and agreement rather than applying one rule to every ACTPS, private-sector or portable-industry worker.

Can a bullying application provide compensation?

FWC stop-bullying orders are preventive and require the relevant coverage, repeated unreasonable behaviour, health-and-safety risk and continuing risk. They cannot order a monetary payment. Reasonable management action carried out reasonably is excluded. Injury compensation, discrimination and dismissal claims are separate routes with different requirements.

Does a support person have to attend every workplace meeting?

There is no universal rule of that kind. In unfair-dismissal assessment, section 387(d) concerns unreasonable refusal of a support person at discussions relating to dismissal. An agreement, policy or a particular public-service process may add rights. Keep the invitation, request and response and check the instrument governing that meeting.

How much does it cost to lodge a Fair Work application?

From 1 July 2026, the listed unfair-dismissal, general-protections and stop-bullying application fee is $92.70. The Commission can waive the applicable fee if satisfied payment would cause serious hardship. Court, appeal and private legal fees are separate, and costs orders can arise under statutory exceptions. Check the current fee for the particular application.

What does the $295 lawyer consultation arrangement include?

The AUD$295 including GST fee is paid to Legal Hotline for matching, booking, intake and arranging an initial consultation with an independent participating lawyer. Eligible booked customers pay no further lawyer charge for that consultation. Suitability, availability, conflicts and acceptance apply. Later work and fees are separate. Booking does not file a claim or meet a deadline; the free line supplies AI general information.

Sources and update record

Checked on 24 October 2026 against selected current Commonwealth and ACT operative provisions, the ACTPS administrative agreement and official guidance. The $92.70 fee, $190,100 threshold and $95,050 half-threshold are date-qualified current figures, not universal charges or outcomes. Other agreements, federal discrimination/harassment routes, injury deadlines, portable leave and individual contract or deed questions require separate assessment.

General information only, not legal advice. Updated . Checked against the sources above on 24 October 2026.

Related legal information

Last updated 24 October 2026
Home Call Book